Duke tower returns to Durham Board of Adjustment after jurisdiction error

The proposal for the cell tower along Scott King Road requires three variances and a special-use permit, with questions about visibility, property values, and whether Duke has shown the required hardship.

Share
Duke tower returns to Durham Board of Adjustment after jurisdiction error
How the 270-foot cell tower would presumably appear to residents across Scott King Road, highlighted in yellow. Source: Duke Energy submission materials
A Birthday Wish for South Durham
I’m asking 100 neighbors to help raise $5,000 by Sept. 22 to expand independent local journalism through Southpoint Access.

Duke Energy wants to build a skyscraper-height cell tower near Scott King Road in South Durham.

The proposed structure would include a 260-foot lattice tower topped by a 10-foot lightning rod, making it roughly as tall as a 25-story building. It would stand on Duke’s Parkwood Tie electrical substation property, about 1,300 feet from Scott King Road and west of Lyons Farm Elementary School.

It wouldn’t primarily serve as a commercial cell tower. Duke says it needs the structure to modernize a communications network used during daily operations, power outages, and other emergencies. But the tower also would be designed to carry equipment for four personal wireless providers.

First, Duke has to persuade the Durham Board of Adjustment to make three exceptions to the county’s development rules and approve a minor special-use permit.

Got opinions about the cell tower proposal? Share your thoughts in the SoDu Town Square!

Sound off!

The property is in a Residential Rural zoning district, where freestanding communications towers ordinarily are limited to 120 feet and required to use a monopole design. Duke wants a tower 140 feet above that limit, a three-legged lattice structure, and permission to use computer-generated images instead of conducting a balloon test to demonstrate the tower’s visibility.

The Board of Adjustment will consider the four applications beginning at 8:30 a.m. Tuesday, Sept. 22.

It’ll be the second time the board has voted on the project. The first decisions didn’t stand because Durham officials had processed the applications under the wrong jurisdiction.

Source: Durham Planning & Development